![]() “Nobody has a problem with seeing people of color in movies, series or stories … but this story was already written and should not have been sullied.” Opined another: “Reflecting world diversity in Middle Earth is an odd goal, albeit good for marketing maybe, but it was clearly more important then making a functional TV series.”īut the majority of the negative reviews - whatever the writers’ private feelings - criticized the show for non-diversity reasons. ![]() “They wanted to involve such an important work with current politics and they have succeeded,” reads an example. Perusing Rotten Tomatoes’ audience reviews for Rings of Power, there are some one-star entries that meet the definition. “Review bombing” is when a group of online users post numerous negative reviews for a product or service due to its perceived cultural or political issues rather than its actual quality. The source later claimed Prime Video started the policy this summer on all its shows. An Amazon source says reviews are being held 72 hours to help weed out trolls and to ensure each review is legitimate. ![]() How The Rings of Power is doing on Amazon’s own user review ecosystem is not yet clear because the company has taken the unusual step of suspending user ratings for the show. The scores come a couple weeks after Marvel’s She-Hulk was declared review bombed on the site, with 88 percent critics score and an initial 36 percent audience score. 'The Rings of Power' Showrunners - and a Geologist - Explain That Mount Doom Surprise ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |